🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the announcement of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after bilateral negotiations in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: another massive barrage of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Peace Talks and Military Action

The sequence of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the recent timeframe. By day, diplomatic battles are waged: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Significant resources is expended on containing certain initiatives. By night, Russian leadership clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's exposure was exposed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor rocket firings from Russian territory, a ability afforded by timely intelligence. From observation points, military aircraft that had been scrambled to counter approaching aerial threats roared overhead – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by NATO members.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: several firings fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely supplied through allied countries. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, causing tremors. The brief panic quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: perhaps the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Not long after, a heavy machine gun engaged a aerial vehicle somewhere nearby, part of a mobile-fire group – most likely imported technology. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the enemy aircraft – it continued its flight toward its objective.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the daybreak reports: several casualties, devastation and heating outages in many homes as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still maintained normal activities – experiencing conflict. But those 24 hours illustrated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a need that neighboring countries are evidently unprepared to fill in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from US administration generated strong feelings, discussion and deep concern – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from American administration unfolds according to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This trend will, undoubtedly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is easy to blame certain parties of persistently promoting Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership works based on a premise well known to experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The White House believes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to abandon the land that it presently holds in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does nothing to discourage Russia, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the situation will not evolve additionally in its favour in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its allies are coming close to fatigue. Their reason to accept conditions that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be many attempts to achieve ceasefire, but they will persist as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the result.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing civilians and areas but avoiding a entire defensive failure until circumstances change in its favour.

Existing Situation

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and secure international recognition, and Kyiv's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the national cause against any plan Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not shift toward internal issues. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains very improbable that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Summary and Prospects

It took a just a single week to eliminate the proposed articles of the current initiative. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all served their function.

While new plans based on old ideas are imminent, Kyiv, London and other Western governments should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and show particular unwillingness to change the course of events, if they stand together and strengthen their defence capabilities at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to defend against evening bombardments will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on ongoing international assistance.